Monday, 12 October 2026

No Escape


When you picture Owen Wilson, who comes to mind? Is it the laid-back charmer from Wedding Crashers? The easy-going Cowboy from Night at the Museum? Or perhaps the free spirit hippie spouting New Age guff in Zoolander?

With his puppyish charm and aw, shucks affability, Wilson has spent three decades winning the affection of audiences by playing a succession of romantic dreamers and lovable underdogs. In the majority of his movies, you essentially meet the same character over and again: a louche, laidback schmoozer – all floppy fringe and ditzy grin – whose primary acting skill seems to be emitting a perfectly enunciated ‘wowww’ in a breathy, Dallas drawl.

All of which makes him just about the last Hollywood actor you might expect to find in No Escape (2015), a brutal – and authentically grisly – survive-the-night action thriller. And yet there he is, looking worried and faintly constipated on the poster. Seeing him in the movie’s publicity materials is a legitimately bizarro experience – something akin to if you learned that Christmas simper-fest The Holiday actually featured Ja Rule and Steven Seagal.

The plot

The film opens sunnily, with Wilson relocating with his wife and their two young daughters to an unnamed Southeast Asian country to take up a new job. 

But what’s that line about best laid plans? The faux-Wilsons barely have time to unpack their bags before a violent coup erupts, literally on their doorstep. Cue pitched battles between local rebels and the rozzers, rampant bloodshed and (eek!) public executions on the streets. Even worse, the rebels quickly overthrow the government and start targeting the foreigners they blame for all the country's political and economic problems.

Since Wilson’s pallid complexion and shaggy blonde mop hardly scream authentic Southeast Asian, he and his family need to quickly hide and hatch an escape plan. As the city descends into total bloody anarchy, Wilson cack-handedly tries to evade armed rebels and navigate the dangerous streets – terrified family in tow – in a bid to escape the country.

It’s hard to imagine a film farther removed from Wilson’s usual comfort zone of tweedy Wes Anderson movies and shaggy rom coms. (Though admittedly, it might have been entertaining to see one of this movie’s AK-47-wielding rebels let loose on The Royal Tenenbaums.)

Hard men on hiatus

Given the nature of No Escape, it seems almost implausible that the lead role didn’t go to some grizzled, square-jawed lunk who would happily spray bullets at the machete-wielding insurgents. And, given half a chance, stab them in the head with an unnecessarily large knife. 

Did nobody think to call Gerard Butler or Jason Statham? Or Frank Grillo, if the film didn’t have a budget. And what about the king of assassin-cinema, Liam Neeson? One can only imagine he punched his agent hard in the throat after seeing such a juicily violent caper go to a flailing blonde moppet, thus escaping his own particular set of acting skills.

A relatable wuss

And yet, dear reader, it turns out that casting directors do occasionally know what they’re doing. Far from bringing the movie down, Wilson quickly proves an inspired casting choice precisely because of his complete lack of action hero pedigree. 

Whenever Butler or Statham are on screen, you only ever wonder where the knife’s going to go or which bone will be cracked next: their work doesn’t exactly scream emotional engagement. But No Escape goes to some pains to underscore that Wilson really is scared and cranky and mostly plain confused, and to demonstrate that he knows naff all about weapons. He’s just a schlubby husband and dad who had the rotten luck to move his family to an exotic country that suddenly turned into a war zone.

As it turns out, this ‘regular dad’ energy – and his apparent weaknesses – become the film’s great strength. Seen through Wilson’s eyes, every terrifying situation feels genuinely terrifying. Watching him grow increasingly exhausted, frightened and out of his depth, most viewers will realise that this is exactly how they would react in the same situation.

You Only Sing Twice…

While Wilson’s portrayal of an ordinary hero is convincing, it does create a sticky problem. Clearly, this panicky doofus making repeated terrible decisions wouldn’t last five minutes in such a deadly situation.

The movie’s ingenious answer? Bring in Pierce Brosnan to riff on his James Bond persona as a helpful, ex-pat. Initially presented as a karaoke-loving drunk on the prowl for cheap beer and cheaper women, Brosnan’s character, Hammond, turns out to be an undercover MI6 agent who helps Wilson a couple of times when things get sticky.

Old Brozzer is clearly having a great time playing a seedier version of his 007 self and lends the movie a welcome dose of chaotic energy. Unfortunately, he also unfurls his deadliest-ever weapon on the unsuspecting viewing audience – that same singing voice that he used  to torture a million ear drums in Mamma Mia. Ye gods. He sounds like a cat being stroked backwards. Nil pois.

Exploding helicopter action

When rioters rampage through Wilson’s hotel early during the action, everyone flees to the roof in the hope of holding out until help arrives. The sudden appearance of a presumed rescue helicopter has the crowd whooping and waving –  until the  fuselage door slides back to reveal a rebel, wielding a machine-gun. Oh, dear.

As the gunner starts blitzing bullets into the screaming crowd of guests, it looks like we’re in for a straightforward villainous turkey shoot. But wait: the helicopter pilot – presumably caught up with bloodlust – idiotically flies into some cables strung across the hotel’s roof. Ensnared, the chopper is dragged into a metal structure before crashing onto the roof and exploding in a thoroughly avoidable fireball.

Exploding helicopter verdict

This won’t be appearing in any of our ‘best of’ lists. The explosion itself is brief and unsatisfying. The circumstances of the crash are witless and anodyne.  As Exploding Helicopter has repeatedly pointed out, movie chopper pilots too often demonstrate a befuddling inability to avoid flying into perfectly observable threats. Who’s flying these things: Mr Magoo?

Still, the crashed copter does prove useful in one way: acting as a barrier to prevent the rebels (who’ve now broken through onto the roof) from getting at Wilson and his family while they make their escape. Given that chopper fireballs generally serve mainly as a visual garnish, it’s refreshing to see this particular wreckage woven into the fabric of the plot.

Interesting fact

The film was originally meant to be called The Coup, until producers realised that most thicko Americans wouldn’t know what ‘coup’ meant. However, following January 6, it’s likely that public awareness of the term has improved considerably. At last, something to thank The Donald for.

Sunday, 20 September 2026

In The Grey

Predictably, it’s no-plot, schlock and two smirking boneheads in Ritchie’s recent caper.

Guy Ritchie isn’t exactly known for not going back to the trough.

Ever since Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels came out almost 30 years ago, the director has relentlessly mined his own Mockney gangster template. But even the hardiest of spirits can only watch a geezer say ‘Leave it aht’ through a camera lens so many times.

And so, over the past decade, Ritchie has taken to making and re-making a different same movie – the hi-jinks action caper. Allowing for variations in location, timeline and cast, In The Grey is pretty much the same as The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, which in turn is very much like the (appallingly titled) Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre.

With each of these movies, Ritchie dutifully bundles in the same ingredients. Chirpy group of sass-talking wrong ‘uns. Nigh-impossible task. Tricksy complications along the way. Good guys comfortably winning out in the end.

If the formula for these films sounds familiar, it’s because they’re all basically Ocean’s Eleven. The only problem is that Guy Ritchie is no Steven Soderberg. The Mockney Wonder wears his cinematic influences increasingly heavily these days but rarely benefits from the comparisons he draws to superior talents. (The Ministry movie, for example, is nothing more than a pound shop Inglourious Basterds.) Frankly, it’s hard to watch In The Grey without thinking of the better films it is ripping off.

Plot

When a ruthless crook steals a billion dollars and retreats to his heavily guarded private island, a covert team of (you guessed it) ‘elite operatives’ is assigned to get the dosh back. Jake Gyllenhaal and Henry Cavill provide the beefcake physicality and weapons, while Eiza Gonzáles is the ball-breaking negotiator.

This being a Guy Ritchie film, the action kicks off with his trademark gimmick – a chirpy voiceover and onscreen graphics laid over snappily edited, exposition-heavy footage. Only this time, it doesn’t stop – a full hour in, the voiceover is somehow still droning on. But amid a clutter of confusing and redundant details, it gradually emerges that Gonzales will be attending a meeting with the baddie, after which the boys need to make sure she gets off the island safely. And that’s pretty much it.

The cast

Ritchie’s early films featured some genuinely interesting characters, but those days are long gone. Gyllenhaal and Cavill, in particular, exhibit a weird kind of anti-chemistry. Sure, they exchange jokey entendres and chummy nicknames, but it’s totally flat. Their joint on-screen energy virtually screams ‘met in the green room two hours ago’.

Gonzáles at least brings a bit of spark and energy to her role, but it’s heavy treading because she’s pretty much an exposition delivery device. And Rosamund Pike, huffing her way through three short scenes as an ice queen investment banker, looks positively embarrassed to be there at all. Given all this, it feels fitting to learn that the baddie was played by Javier Bardem’s older, fatter, less talented brother.

The action

The absence of any perceived stakes has increasingly become an issue in Ritchie’s movies. Obviously, no movie star is actually going to die in a generic action caper – but talented directors can at least put them in convincing jeopardy and make you worry a little.

At this point, Ritchie doesn’t even try. When Gyllenhaal and Cavill are surrounded by an armed militia at the movie’s supposed peak moment, they spend ten minutes blithely dispensing bullets at scores of goons who simply run forward, lemming-like, holding their guns instead of actually shooting them. There is more dramatic tension watching traffic lights change.

Early on, the viewer is warned that the villain rules his fortress island with an iron fist and even has the local police force firmly in pocket. Ritchie then spends a full forty minutes showing Gyllenhaal and pals noisily and obviously practising their escape routes off the island.

They career loudly around the whole place with jeeps, beach buggies and dirt bikes. They fly around in rotor-copters,. They even erect zip-lines and (yes, really) dig up a public road in order to lay a vehicle trap for the baddies. How on earth they are able to do all this without raising a flicker of suspicion from the local armed goons and authorities is not a question that seems to have concerned Ritchie.

Exploding helicopter action

As the film nears its climax, the heroes are hurtling down a dusty road in a beach buggy. Suddenly, an open-sided helicopter sways into views and the villain’s chief henchman – yon big ginger, beardy bloke from Game of Thrones – starts blasting them with an AK-47 and then some mini-bomb gun.

The boys cannily pull up inside an abandoned building, so Gyllenhaal can pull out a just-happened-to-have-it-with-me shoulder-mounted missile launcher. He shoots, and there’s trademark close-up of beardy’s terrified face as the missile whizzes towards him. Boom.

Exploding helicopter verdict

Ritchie appears to have put as much effort into his chopper conflagration as he did into his characters. From a distance, there’s a small puff of black smoke, then a closer shot showing the front end of a chopper, wrapped in an unconvincing swirl of CGI flames, twisting down towards the ocean. Meh.

Hall of shame

A final infuriating detail. Despite training hard with jeeps and motorbikes on a dusty, dirty island, and staying in a literal hovel (the squalor of their digs is a running, er, joke), Gyllenhaal and Cavill appear in each new scene wearing a succession of spotless and clearly brand-new designer outfits. It often looks like an actual GQ spread. In a movie with a serious verisimilitude problem, it’s the final straw.